A Study of Food Waste in Pacific Northwest Plums
Challenge
The Pacific Coast Food Waste Commitment (PCFWC) is a public-private partnership focused on reducing food waste on the West Coast by half by 2030. The partnership brings together food businesses, local jurisdictions, and other partners to collaborate on solutions and share data.
PCFWC wanted to understand the biggest food waste drivers for a specific plum supply chain in the Pacific Northwest, along with potential solutions. This innovative whole chain approach examines less-often studied local supply chains from farm to retail.
Implementation
PCFWC commissioned the Global Impact Collective to conduct a quantitative and qualitative case study of organic plum food loss and waste along the value chain.
Qualitative Analysis
The Global Impact Collective team, led by Judith Hochhauser Schneider and Cady Susswein, interviewed participants at the farm, distribution center, and multiple locations of a retail grocer to unearth nuanced aspects of each node’s role. For instance, talking with produce managers at several retail locations uncovered stark differences in approaches to waste from store to store. Success at the retail level was highly dependent on the manager’s experience.
This represented a clear opportunity for the company to align on training, standard operating procedures, and streamlined digital and analog tools to achieve short-term waste reduction. Our human-centered approach allowed room for the interviewee to tailor the conversation based on their own experiences.
Quantitative Analysis
The Global Impact Collective worked with an agroecology expert to use the World Wildlife Fund’s Global Farm Loss Tool to study food loss and waste at the farm level. Using this tool, the analyst estimated waste on the farm by taking a 100-square-foot sample area around a tree and measuring the amount of marketable, edible but non-marketable, and inedible fruit that was in the tree and on the ground directly after harvest.
Simultaneously, Cady worked with our data analyst to gather similar datasets for the distribution center and participating grocery stores. This required liaising with multiple stakeholders across each node of the supply chain to understand their data collection processes, tools, and key metrics, ensuring that the data sets could be aggregated and cross-tabulated to provide a holistic understanding of food loss hotspots.
The data uncovered how much waste — nearly 78% of waste across the supply chain — occurred at the farm level due to the speed and unpredictability of fruit that ripened in the field. As a result, our top recommendation was to enhance cold storage on the farm and enhance coordination with the distributor. While most of the edible, non-marketable fruit did not make its way down the chain, the distribution center further sorted and graded the fruit to ensure minimal wastage.
The distribution team found channels with local microprocessors (such as distillers and juicers) for edible but non-marketable fruit. However, because of an overall decline in this local industry, matching quantity with processors during a short window might be challenging in the future. Our qualitative analysis also helped the retailer better understand the differences in waste across varieties of plums and find new solutions to help market lesser-known varieties.
Final Report and Case Study
The Global Impact Collective compiled qualitative and quantitative results into a final case study and worked with PCFWC and its partners to publish. The recommendations we made would have an immediate impact on both the plum supply chain and others like it.
Impact
Since publishing the case study, participants in the plum supply chain have already noted changes that they have made or will make in their approach. For instance, the retailer said it’s working to separate plum SKUs to better track waste across varieties and better understand customer preferences.
After publication, the Global Impact Collective facilitated a listening session that brought the community together to hear the study results and start a conversation on how to work together to implement the recommended changes. We leveraged our networks to bring together representatives from the State of Oregon, City of Portland, manufacturing companies, the food service industry, and community-based organizations. Several new ideas were discussed, including using grants to strengthen the local market for micro-processing. It was a perfect way to bring the report to life and begin to activate the community immediately.
Among other next steps, Global Impact Collective recommended a follow-up evaluation to assess whether implemented actions/tactics drove desired behavior changes among the supply chain partners.
Read the final case study here.